🔗 Share this article

Per a recent examination, dozens of personnel with backgrounds in the petroleum industry have been placed within the existing administration, featuring more than 40 who earlier served directly for coal companies.

Context of the Report

The study investigated the profiles of candidates and appointees working in the White House and eight government offices handling environmental matters. Those include major entities including the environmental agency, the Interior Department, and the Department of Energy.

Larger Administrative Context

The analysis comes amid continuing efforts to dismantle energy rules and alternative energy incentives. For example, new bills have opened extensive sections of public property for drilling and eliminated support for sustainable energy.

With the firehose of bad things that have transpired on the ecological side... it’s crucial to educate the public that these are not just steps from the vague, massive thing that is the government generally, stated one analyst involved in the analysis. They are commonly particular actors originating from specific wealthy interests that are executing this damaging deregulatory program.

Significant Discoveries

Authors discovered 111 employees whom they deemed as industry insiders and clean energy critics. That includes 43 individuals who were previously employed by gas enterprises. Included in them are high-profile leading leaders like the head of energy, who formerly acted as chief executive of a fracking corporation.

This list also contains lower-profile administration personnel. For example, the department overseeing energy efficiency is headed by a ex- oil manager. Similarly, a high-level regulatory consultant in the executive office has held high-ranking roles at prominent petroleum firms.

Other Connections

Another 12 personnel possess connections to energy-financed rightwing research groups. Those cover former staff and fellows of groups that have actively opposed clean power and promoted the use of fossil fuels.

Additionally 29 additional officials are ex- business managers from polluting fields whose operations are directly tied to energy resources. Further officials have connections with energy companies that distribute fossil fuels or government representatives who have pushed pro-oil initiatives.

Departmental Emphasis

Analysts identified that 32 employees at the Department of the Interior individually have connections to fossil fuel energy, making it the highest influenced national department. This encompasses the head of the department, who has repeatedly received oil support and acted as a conduit between fossil fuel industry donors and the campaign.

Political Funding

Oil and gas donors contributed significant funds to the election effort and inauguration. Since assuming power, the administration has not only established pro-fossil fuel policies but also crafted benefits and exceptions that favor the sector.

Experience Issues

Besides industry-linked appointees, the analysts found multiple administration leaders who were appointed to key positions with scant or no subject matter knowledge.

Those officials may not be tied to oil and gas so explicitly, but their lack of expertise is concerning, said one researcher. It is reasonable to think they will be pushovers, or vulnerable targets, for the fossil fuel agenda.

For example, the candidate to lead the environmental agency’s division of general counsel has limited legal history, having not once argued a lawsuit to verdict, nor conducted a testimony, and never argued a legal request.

In a separate instance, a White House aide working on regulatory issues arrived to the position after working in jobs unrelated to the industry, with no apparent relevant energy industry or administrative background.

Administration Statement

One spokesperson for the White House rejected the analysis, saying that the government’s personnel are exceptionally capable to implement on the public’s mandate to expand national resource output.

Historical and Current Context

This government implemented a significant number of anti-environmental measures during its previous period. During its second term, prepared with rightwing agendas, it has spearheaded a considerably more extensive and stricter rollback on ecological policies and renewable energy.

There’s no hesitation, commented one analyst. They are eager and willing to go out there and tout the fact that they are doing favors for the fossil fuel industry, extractive field, the mining business.